The Atlas Collection
Travel posters
For places worth remembering. Modern prints inspired by favourite coastlines, towns and landmarks.
New destinations added regularly
Posters from the places you love
Over 2,700 curated artists
Browse all artists
Curated by Artists
Museum Quality Prints
Crafted to Last
Designed for Interiors
Style It Your Way
Popular prints available framed or on canvas
Timeless Art For Beautifully Designed Homes
Why Choose Us ?
What customers say
Over 5000
Happy Art Lovers
From Our Journal
Persephone and the Flower Gathering
Zeus fathers Zagreus with Persephone and enthrones him as his successor, but the Titans lure the child from his guarded cave and tear him apart. Athena rescues his heart, and Zagreus returns to life in the Orphic account, where Dionysus is another name for him. The Birth of Zagreus Zeus secretly united with Persephone before she was taken to the Underworld by her uncle Hades. He sometimes approached her in the form of a serpent, while another account gives him the form of Hades. Persephone gave birth to Zagreus, whom the Orphic tradition also calls Dionysus. Zeus intended the boy to succeed him and enthroned him while he was still young. Zeus placed Zagreus in the Idaean Cave under the protection of Rhea’s sons. These guardians were the Cretan Curetes, or, in another account, the Corybantes. They leaped around his cradle and struck their weapons together, as they had done for Zeus at Dicte. Zeus’s enemies, the Titans, whitened themselves with gypsum so that they could not be recognised. They waited until the guardians slept, then lured Zagreus away with toys. These included a cone, a bull-roarer, golden apples, a mirror, a knuckle-bone, and a tuft of wool. When the Titans attacked, Zagreus changed his shape in an effort to escape. He became Zeus wearing a goat-skin coat, Cronus making rain, a lion, a horse, a horned serpent, a tiger, and finally a bull. The Titans seized him by the horns and feet, tore him apart, and ate his flesh. Another account says that they boiled the pieces in a cauldron. The Orphic story attributes the attack to Hera’s jealousy and says that she ordered the Titans to seize the child. The accounts also differ about what followed. Athena is said to have rescued Zagreus’s heart and given it to Semele to swallow, allowing the child to be born again. In another Orphic version, Persephone and, in some accounts, Demeter cared for Dionysus after his return to life. From the remains that were rescued and collected, Dionysus rose again. Source note: Primary text: Hesiod, Theogony. Corpus check: The Greek Myths; Greek religion. The Birth of Persephone Zeus fathered Persephone with Demeter, and Demeter gave birth to the maiden. She was also known as Kore, meaning Girl or Maiden, and as Cora and Phersephone. Her name appeared in the Attic form Pherrephatta. Persephone was the daughter of Zeus and Demeter, and she was a grain goddess like her mother. Demeter ruled the earth, harvest, and fertility, while Persephone grew up among flowers and fertile fields. Hades desired Persephone as his bride and queen. He went to Zeus, his brother, and asked for her hand in marriage. Zeus knew that Hades would care for her, but he feared Demeter’s anger and sorrow. He neither granted nor refused permission. Encouraged by this answer, Hades went to the place where Persephone gathered flowers. He seized her as she picked them, and a great chasm opened in the earth. Hades placed her under his arm, and his horses carried them into the dark world below. Demeter did not realise at once that Persephone had vanished. After many hours, she understood that her daughter was gone, and she began to search for her. She rejected Zeus, avoided the council of the gods, and wandered in grief and anger. On the tenth day, Hecate told her that Persephone had been abducted, but she did not know by whom. Helios then told Demeter that Hades had taken her. While Demeter searched and mourned, nothing grew. Seeds failed to sprout, people starved, and the gods received none of their customary offerings. Demeter found Persephone in the Underworld, but Persephone had eaten pomegranate seeds there. Zeus therefore arranged that she would marry Hades and live with him as queen of the Underworld for part of each year. The stories gave either four or six months for this stay. Persephone spent the rest of the year in the upper world with Demeter, and she and Hades acted together when she ruled among the dead. The Birth of Persephone. Original MythSource illustration created for this story; not a historical artwork. Source note: Primary text: Hesiod, Theogony. Corpus check: Greek Myths & Tales. The Flower Gathering and Abduction Persephone gathered flowers with the Oceanids in a peaceful meadow. Gaia had prepared a beautiful bloom at Hades’ request, and its appearance drew Persephone towards it. As she bent to pluck the flower, the earth opened beneath her. Hades rose from the depths in a golden chariot drawn by horses. He seized Persephone despite her cries, held her beneath one arm, and carried her into the dark world below. Hades drove the chariot back into the earth and took Persephone into the land of the dead. There she became his queen. Hades had first asked Zeus for permission to marry her. Zeus knew that Hades would care for his daughter, but he feared Demeter’s anger and regretted losing Persephone to a world from which no mortal returned. He therefore said that he could neither grant nor deny his consent. Hades treated this answer as permission and carried out the abduction. Demeter heard Persephone’s cry. She realised that her daughter had vanished and refused to accept the loss. She shunned Zeus, left the assembly of the gods, and began searching across the whole world. She wandered over land and sea, driven by grief and anger. She fasted, wore her hair untied, and carried flaming torches as she travelled. In one telling, Demeter met different people in different lands, stayed in different places, and received news of Persephone from different informants. In another, the chasm opened near the Kyane spring beside Syracuse. Other tellings placed the meadow and the descent at Enna, Colonus, Hermione, Crete, Pisa, Lerna, Pheneus, Nysa, or Eleusis. Demeter continued her search for her vanished daughter. Source note: Primary text: Hesiod, Theogony. Corpus check: Greek Myths & Tales.
The Gleaners: Millet's Three Figures in a Field
In his 1857 oil painting The Gleaners, Jean-François Millet depicts three impoverished peasant women bent over a harvested field, collecting remaining scraps of wheat. The work combines detailed rural observation with direct commentary on social inequality in nineteenth-century France. Composition and Subject Description In The Gleaners, painted in 1857, Jean-François Millet places three peasant women squarely in the foreground of a wide, open field. The women perform the backbreaking and tedious work of collecting the scanty remains left behind after a wheat harvest. Their figures are heavy, shown with curved backs and anonymous faces as they scour the newly harvested ground. Each woman bends low to gather leftover grain, filling her apron with whatever slim pickings can be found. Millet used simplified, sculptural forms to depict these labourers, giving their physical posture a monumental quality that dominates the lower portion of the canvas. The background of the canvas creates a spatial contrast with the three central figures in the foreground. In the distance, along a flat horizon bordered by haystacks, cottages, trees, and small figures of workers, the main harvesters are busy loading up a plentiful crop onto wagons. A cool, golden light illuminates the entire countryside scene, exposing the vast gap between the abundant harvest gathered for the landowners and the sparse leftovers left for the poor. By placing the impoverished women in front against a broad sky, Millet ensured that their labour remains the primary focus of the viewer. The Practice and Social Context of Gleaning Gleaning was an established rural practice in France, historically permitted by landowning nobles for the lowest level of peasant society. After the primary crop was reaped and gathered, impoverished individuals were allowed onto the land to collect any remaining scraps of wheat. The task was time-consuming and physically demanding, yet essential for the survival of the poorest rural families. Millet documented this custom during a historical period when traditional countryside routines were beginning to be displaced by the growth of the Industrial Revolution. Prior to Millet's painting, gleaning had typically been represented in Western art through religious history, most notably the Old record story of Ruth. In those earlier artistic traditions, Ruth was depicted as a modest, virtuous woman, placing the practice within a framework of moral piety. Millet broke away from these traditional conventions by presenting gleaning with flagrant realism. Rather than offering a biblical narrative, he depicted the harsh physical reality of rural poverty, showing anonymous women engaged in tedious physical labour without idealised divine intervention. Millet Gleaners. Public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. Millet and the Barbizon School Jean-François Millet was born in 1814 into a prosperous farming family in northern France. He initially pursued artistic training locally before moving to Paris in his early twenties to continue his education at the École des Beaux-Arts under the painter Paul Delaroche. During his early years in Paris, Millet worked primarily as a portrait painter. However, following the political upheavals of the 1848 French Revolution, he decided to leave the capital and relocated to the small village of Barbizon, situated near Fontainebleau Forest. In Barbizon, Millet became a central figure among a group of artists known as the Barbizon School, who specialised in detailed pictures of the countryside and forest environments. While many of his contemporaries focused strictly on scenery details, Millet brought his own rural background to bear on his subjects, identifying with the hard lot of the country poor. He concentrated on painting scenes of rural life, depicting agricultural workers with empathy and solemn grandeur that elevated working-class subjects to a monumental scale. Political Controversy and Public Reaction When Millet exhibited The Gleaners in Paris, the painting provoked strong disdain and suspicion among conservative thinkers and the French public. In the aftermath of the 1848 revolution, the prosperous middle class and landowning elites were alarmed by depictions that invested the poor with dignity and monumentality. Middle-class landowners were increasingly resisting the traditional granting of gleaning rights, fearing the rural poor and linking them to the newly emerging, politically active urban working class. Conservative critics viewed Millet's depiction of working-class poverty as a subversive political statement and a direct criticism of French social structures. They condemned what they perceived as an improper glorification of peasants and the working poor. During this period, prominent political writers such as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, alongside novelists including Émile Zola and Charles Dickens, were actively championing the working class, making Millet's artistic subjects deeply contentious among middle-class viewers. Despite this hostility from conservative quarters, other contemporary viewers and socialist commentators strongly defended Millet's work. Admirers praised his bold stance and artistic approach, viewing The Gleaners as a celebration of honest, hard-working lives rather than a political threat. They appreciated his empathy for agricultural labourers and his use of surprisingly varied colours to convey the dignity of peasant life. Style, Technique, and Modernity Measuring approximately 83.5 by 111 centimetres, The Gleaners demonstrates Millet's mastery of oil on canvas technique. The painter achieved a calm atmosphere across the surrounding countryside through a balanced composition and a refined palette of earthy tones, muted yellows, and soft blues. His preliminary drawings for the composition show a sculptural simplification of form, reducing complex figures to heavy, solid shapes that emphasise their intimacy with the land and the physical gravity of their pose. By portraying the reality of rural labour without academic polish, Millet represented a broader transition from traditional academic painting to Naturalism and Realism, paving the way towards modern art. Although his paintings retained a certain sentimentality compared to the uncompromising works of Gustave Courbet, Millet's realistic treatment of peasant life altered how working people were portrayed in art history. Today, The Gleaners is housed in the Musée d'Orsay in Paris, where it remains a central work of nineteenth-century French painting.
Cú Chulainn: Birth, Arms and the Road to Scáthach
During a strange night, Deichtine helped deliver a boy while the Ulstermen lodged in her house, then nursed him alongside two foals before the house vanished. After his death, a creature in wine led to a second conception, making Lugh his divine father. The Conception and Birth of Cú Chulainn A woman went into labour during the night while a company of Ulstermen, including Briccriu and Fergus, stayed in her spacious house. Outside, a mare gave birth to two foals. Deichtine entered the house to help with the birth and brought out a boy. The Ulstermen took charge of him and gave him the foals. Deichtine nursed him at her breast. At dawn, the house and its occupants had vanished. Nothing remained eastward of the Brug except the Ulstermen’s horses, the baby and the two foals. The company returned to Emain Macha, where Deichtine raised the boy. He was called Sétanta. He later fell ill with a fever and died. The women of Ulster lamented him, and Deichtine grieved deeply for her foster-son. After the lamentation, Deichtine returned home and asked her servant for a drink. A cup of wine was brought to her. A tiny creature was in the drink, and she swallowed it without noticing. This creature was the means by which Lugh fathered a child. Accounts differ over whether Lugh appeared to Deichtine in human form, as a god, in a dream, or while she was in bird form. In the account of the miraculous conception, the child was later brought forth from her. Deichtine bore a son and gave him the name Sétanta. His conception made Lugh his divine father. The heroes of Ulster disputed who should raise him, then shared responsibility for his upbringing. Each offered what he could teach or give. Fergus instructed him in the manly arts, Findchóem nursed him, Conall Cernach became his foster brother, and Conchobar became his foster father. Other accounts say that Sualtaim mac Roich was his father, or that Deichtine remained a virgin by vomiting out the child. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Celtic Mythology; The Táin : translated from the Irish epic Táin Bó Cualinge. Cú Chulainn Takes Arms A prophecy of glory reached Cú Chulainn, and he seized weapons. He set out in a chariot with his charioteer, Ibor, on his first outing. Ibor warned him that danger lay ahead, but the boy would not turn back. They travelled through Mag mBreg, and Ibor named the forts, fields, fords, settlements, strongholds and fortresses between Temair and Cenannos. He pointed out the fort of the three sons of Nechta Scéne. The brothers were Fóill, Fannall and Tuachell. Their father was Fer Ulli, son of Lugaid, and their mother was Nechta Scéne. They were enemies of the Ulstermen because the Ulstermen had killed their father. They also claimed to have killed as many Ulstermen as were then living. Cú Chulainn asked to meet them. Ibor warned him against seeking such danger, but Cú Chulainn said they were not travelling there to avoid it. They released the horses where the bog met the river, and Cú Chulainn told Ibor to wake him if warriors appeared. The three sons came down to the stream and demanded to know who had entered their land. Ibor said that a boy was there on his first outing and that he was taking him home. Fóill mocked the boy and ordered him to leave. Cú Chulainn woke and declared that no boy was there, only a man ready to fight. Ibor warned him that Fóill the Sly could not be struck after a first missed thrust. Cú Chulainn swore by the god of his people that Conchobar’s spear would not miss. He cast it at Fóill and broke his back, then cut off his head and took his spoils. He killed Fannall and Tuachell as well, taking the weapons of the three brothers. Cú Chulainn then told Ibor to drive towards Emain Macha. He first made the charioteer circle the fortress so that the other boys could see him. When Ibor tried to return through the gates, Cú Chulainn ordered him onwards. They travelled to Sliab Fúait, where Conall Cernach was keeping watch for Ulster. Cú Chulainn claimed that he had come to relieve him. When Conall said he was too young, Cú Chulainn broke the shaft of his chariot with a stone. He then returned to Emain Macha in a battle frenzy. Cú Chulainn Takes Arms. Original MythSource illustration created for this story; not a historical artwork. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Celtic Mythology. The Wooing of Emer and Training with Scáthach Cú Chulainn drove with his charioteer, Laeg mac Riangabra, to the Gardens of Lug to meet Emer, daughter of Forgall Monach. No chariot team in Ulster could match their speed. Emer was on the green with her foster-sisters, who were studying embroidery and fine stitching with her. She recognised Cú Chulainn and greeted him. He had come after a search lasting a year, during which messengers had looked throughout Ireland for a suitable wife for him without success. Cú Chulainn and Emer became attached to one another. Emer declared that she loved him and that she was under his protection. Forgall opposed the match. He presented Emer to Lugaid, the great king of Alamiach’s son, who had come with twelve chariot-warriors to seek wives. Emer resisted the proposed marriage. She held Lugaid’s cheeks and swore by his life and honour that she loved Cú Chulainn. Lugaid feared Cú Chulainn and returned home without taking her as his wife. Cú Chulainn then travelled to Alba, where Scáthach was at war with her rival Aífe. Scáthach trained him in supernatural combat. He underwent demanding adventures and learned the skills needed for battle. During this time he faced Aífe and defeated her. His training with Scáthach completed the trials connected with his courtship of Emer. Cú Chulainn returned from Alba and won Emer as his wife. The courtship had taken him from the Gardens of Lug to Forgall’s opposition, then to Alba and Scáthach’s instruction. Emer’s own resolve helped preserve her bond with him, while Cú Chulainn’s journey and victory over Aífe secured his claim to marry her. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Celtic Mythology Rocks!; The Táin : translated from the Irish epic Táin Bó Cualinge.





