The Atlas Collection
Travel posters
For places worth remembering. Modern prints inspired by favourite coastlines, towns and landmarks.
New destinations added regularly
Posters from the places you love
Over 2,700 curated artists
Browse all artists
Curated by Artists
Museum Quality Prints
Crafted to Last
Designed for Interiors
Style It Your Way
Popular prints available framed or on canvas
![Green and Maroon - Mark Rothko - Poster [HQ 3c667201b8de]](http://www.solisprints.co.uk/cdn/shop/files/Rothko-Poster-none-fe6a126ae048.jpg?v=1791244683&width=3840)
Timeless Art For Beautifully Designed Homes
Why Choose Us ?
What customers say
Over 5000
Happy Art Lovers
From Our Journal
The Book of the Dead: Images for the Afterlife
The ancient Egyptian Book of the Dead was an illustrated collection of spells and prayers created during the New Kingdom. Placed inside tombs, these papyrus scrolls provided deceased individuals with the necessary knowledge and legal arguments to pass divine judgment, survive the underworld, and achieve eternal life alongside the gods. Origins and Evolution of Funerary Spells During the Old Kingdom, Egyptian funerary texts were carved directly onto royal tomb walls. The Pyramid Texts of King Unis, who ruled during the Fifth Dynasty around 2341 BCE, represent the earliest surviving examples of these resurrection incantations. Inscribed inside his pyramid at Saqqara, these early spells were designed specifically to assist the pharaoh in rising to join the celestial deities. Beliefs surrounding the afterlife expanded significantly during the Middle Kingdom. Non-royal elites began adopting royal burial prayers, which scribes adapted into inscriptions on wooden coffins known as the Coffin Texts. By the Eighteenth Dynasty of the New Kingdom, these collected prayers were compiled into papyrus scrolls known today as the Book of the Dead. Over two hundred distinct spells were recorded across various surviving scrolls. The production of papyrus scrolls allowed a wider segment of Egyptian society to purchase funerary texts. Anyone with sufficient financial resources could commission a scroll from a scribal workshop. Relatives placed the completed papyrus scroll directly inside the coffin or wrapped it within the mummy bandaging itself to protect the deceased on their journey through the netherworld. Narrative Structure on Papyrus Scrolls Scribes recorded the Book of the Dead on long scrolls manufactured from papyrus reeds. The visual style derived directly from traditional Egyptian tomb wall painting, but artisans adapted the imagery to fit the continuous horizontal band of the papyrus surface. The visual scenes accompanied the written incantations to guide the soul through each underworld trial. The papyrus scrolls used a continuous narrative format. Scribes and painters depicted the central figure multiple times across successive scenes without using dividing architectural frames. Notable examples include the scroll commissioned for the royal scribe Hunefer around 1285 BCE and the Papyrus of Ani from the Eighteenth Dynasty, both preserved in the British Museum in London. In these scrolls, text and visual illustration worked together as a functional unit. The written incantations explained the precise spoken responses required of the deceased, while the illustrations provided clear visual representations of the deities and judgment halls. This combined format ensured that the deceased possessed both the recited knowledge and visual recognition needed for safe passage. Papyrus of Ani BM Sheet 12. Public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. The Trial of the Soul and the Scale The central ritual depicted in these papyrus scrolls is the weighing of the heart. The jackal-headed god Anubis leads the ka, representing the active soul of the deceased, into the Hall of the Two Truths while holding an ankh, the symbol of life. The deceased person was required to swear to forty-two deities overhead that they had lived a righteous life in accordance with ma'at. At the balance scales, Anubis weighs the heart of the deceased, which is contained in a small jar, against the feather of truth representing Ma'at. The ibis-headed god Thoth, acting as the court scribe, stands nearby to record the judgment outcome on a tablet. The heart had to remain light enough not to outweigh the ostrich feather of Ma'at. Ammut, a monster composed of a crocodile head, lion forelegs, and hippopotamus hindquarters, stands watching the scales greedily. If a heart weighed more than the feather due to unjust living, Ammut devoured the soul, denying it an afterlife. If the deceased passed the test without evil deeds recorded against them, Ammut went hungry and the soul proceeded forward. Presentation Before Osiris Once declared true of voice, the deceased was escorted by the falcon-headed god Horus to face Osiris. To gain entry into paradise, the dead person recited memorised prayers, which were also written on scroll leaves or coffin lids. Osiris sits in a pavilion floating above a lake of natron, the salt compound used for preserving the physical body during embalming. Osiris holds the emblems of Egyptian kingship and wears a white mummiform shroud. His wife Isis, goddess of life, and her sister Nephthys stand behind his throne. Nephthys is recognised as the mother of Anubis and a protector of the dead, while Ma'at hovers overhead to confirm that the deceased lived in ethical harmony. In front of Osiris, the four miniature sons of Horus stand upon a white lotus blossom, which acts as a symbol of rebirth. These four gods represented the cardinal directions and protected the internal organs removed during the embalming process. Their placement on the lotus blossom confirmed that the deceased had achieved spiritual resurrection. Concepts of the Soul and Paradise Ancient Egyptian theology recognised multiple overlapping aspects of human identity after death. These included the Ba, depicted as a bird with a human head, and the Sha, an image-soul that duplicated the physical appearance of the deceased. The Ka represented the active personality surviving without the physical body, maintaining its presence near the burial place. Upon passing all judgment tests, the deceased received offerings and gained access to Sekhet-hetepu, known as the Field of Peace. Texts such as the Papyrus of Ani record that righteous souls were granted cakes and permission to dwell in the presence of Osiris, ensuring their ongoing survival alongside the followers of Horus. The ultimate objective of the Book of the Dead was to secure this celestial existence. By equipping the deceased with spells to satisfy the judges and pass every trial, the scrolls provided reassurance that a life lived in accordance with divine order would be rewarded with eternal life in paradise.
Fionn and the Salmon of Knowledge
A burn from the cooking salmon gave Fionn access to the wisdom held by the fish. The knowledge included prophetic understanding, and thereafter he could discover answers by sucking his thumb. Fionn and the Salmon of Knowledge The salmon came to Finnéces’s line after the old druid had waited seven years for it. He caught the fish and set it to cook beside the water. The boy Fionn, then called Demne Máel, watched it turn on the spit. Finnéces warned him not to touch or taste the salmon, because it held great wisdom. Hazel bushes grew beside the pool. Their nuts fell into the water, and the nuts contained the wisdom of the world. The salmon ate them and gained their knowledge. As the fish cooked, it sizzled and spat. Grease or liquid struck Fionn’s thumb and burned him. Without thinking, he put the injured thumb into his mouth. Wisdom passed into Fionn at once. He gained the knowledge that Finnéces had hoped to obtain, including prophetic understanding. After this, Fionn could find the answer to almost any question by chewing his thumb. The Fenian narratives give variant names for the fish. It is sometimes called Fintan, a bard who had lived through many incarnations. It is also called Goll Essa Ruaid, the one-eyed salmon of Assaroe. The account therefore links Fionn’s wisdom to the salmon, the hazel nuts, and the brief act that transferred the knowledge to him. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Encyclopedia of Celtic Mythology and Folklore; Celtic Mythology. Fionn Becomes Leader of the Fianna Goll mac Morna returned from exile, defeated Cumhal, killed him, and scattered the Clan Baíscne. Cumhal’s posthumous son was taken away and raised in secret. He trained in martial skills and became a capable warrior. After defeating a rival in a contest, he was called Fionn, meaning “the fair boy”. He was also known as Fionn mac Cumhaill, Fionn son of Cumhall. Fionn continued his training with the warrior woman Buanann and the warrior Cethern mac Fintain. By manhood, he could run faster than any other person, strike his target with a spear, and swim across any body of water. He could also suck his thumb and learn the whereabouts and weaknesses of an enemy. His skill and judgement won him recognition as a warrior. For a time, the Fianna served the High King of Ireland. They remained ready to march against disturbances within Ireland or foreign enemies. Their demands angered the people, while their pride offended the king. Disputes within the Fianna led to fighting among themselves. The king and the people then joined forces against them. Before this decline, Fionn performed a deed of prowess and the High King offered him a boon. Fionn asked for his lawful inheritance and declared his name. The king ordered Goll to acknowledge Fionn’s rights. Goll opposed him and claimed the chieftainship of the Fianna. Fionn accused Goll of murdering his father and ruling wrongfully. He challenged Goll to mortal combat. The king gave the signal. Fionn proved his martial ability, and the High King recognised his claim. Fionn became leader of the Fianna despite Goll’s opposition. Fionn Becomes Leader of the Fianna. Original MythSource illustration created for this story; not a historical artwork. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Monsters of Celtic Mythology. Fionn and the Enchanted Doe Sadhbh wore the shape of a doe when Fionn encountered her. He fell in love with her despite the form imposed on her. They came together, and Sadhbh later gave birth to a son. They named the child Oisín, meaning “little fawn”. Oisín remained human, but he carried a mark of his mother’s enchantment. One account says that Sadhbh had been warned that licking her human baby would turn him into a deer. She avoided doing so, although her tongue touched his forehead slightly. The boy therefore kept a small tuft of deer fur there. Another account places the fur across his eyebrows. Oisín grew into a gifted poet and a capable warrior. He travelled with Fionn and the Fianna, the band of warriors who followed Fionn and guarded Ireland against invaders. The Fenian narratives present Fionn as fearless and wise. They present Oisín as the most eloquent of his peers. Sadhbh did not remain with Fionn. The otherworldly Dark Druid reclaimed her and took her back to the world beyond ordinary human life. Oisín stayed with Fionn and the Fianna. His name and the small mark on his head recalled his mother’s doe shape. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Encyclopedia of Celtic Mythology and Folklore.
How to Read a Byzantine Icon
To read a Byzantine icon, a viewer must interpret specific visual conventions. Rigid frontality, enlarged staring eyes, golden backgrounds, and precise facial expressions guide the worshipper. These elements transform a painted wooden panel into a direct visual connection with the holy figure depicted on the surface. Visual Conventions of Gaze and Gold Byzantine icons rely on frontality and direct eye contact to engage the viewer. Images of saints or holy figures feature wide, staring eyes and static postures. Bust-length compositions remove distracting earthly details, directing all visual attention to the face. Gold leaf backgrounds create an unearthly radiance. Painters applied thin films of egg tempera over reflective gold leaf, allowing ambient light to shine through shadows and creating a luminous, glowing surface. This use of gold leaf connects panel painting directly to mosaic traditions developed in Early Christian churches. The light does not originate from a painted external light source within the image. Instead, the reflective gold backdrop illuminates the figure from behind. Viewers in Byzantium regarded these small wooden panels as portable equivalents of church wall mosaics. The gold surface creates a sense of timeless space completely detached from ordinary earthly geography. Facial Asymmetry and Narrative Framing Reading an icon requires close examination of facial details and subtle asymmetries. On a sixth-century panel icon of Christ preserved at Mount Sinai, the two sides of the face communicate distinct messages to the viewer. The right side of Christ's face, which appears on the left side from the viewer's perspective, features an open eye and a welcoming expression. The left side appears stern, with an arched eyebrow, a shadowed cheekbone, and a downturned mouth indicating judgment. Early icons created before the eighth century, such as the sixth or seventh-century encaustic Madonna from Sta. Francesca Romana in Rome, exhibit strong geometric severity. They feature heart-shaped facial outlines, small mouths, long narrow noses, and large eyes beneath arched eyebrows. While portrait icons use strict frontality, narrative icons depicting Gospel scenes adjust this rule. In narrative panels, painters set actors in three-quarter frontal poses, allowing them to interact while still looking outward toward the observer. Massacre of the Innocents (Ionian, 17th c., Byzantine museum). Public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. Materials, Techniques, and Compositional Patterns Byzantine artists used specific materials that defined the physical appearance of the icon. Before the iconoclastic period, painters frequently used encaustic, a wax-based medium capable of delicate light gradations. Later artists predominantly used egg tempera on prepared wooden boards. Beyond panel paintings, some of the most precious icons were miniature mosaics executed directly on small panels. Other sacred icons took the form of carved marble slabs, woven textiles, or struck coins. Icon painters followed established visual patterns across centuries. A late thirteenth-century panel of the Madonna Enthroned features linear drapery striations rendered as abstract, sunburst-like patterns. The throne uses foreshortened architectural forms reminiscent of ancient Roman structures, yet it functions as a flat, transparent design element. Softly shaded faces contrast with these linear patterns. Artists maintained these formal rules to preserve the recognizable identity of each holy figure, ensuring visual consistency across generations of worshippers. The Theology of Replication In Byzantine theology, an icon was valid because it replicated an established divine prototype. The Greek word eikon means image. Ninth-century church theologians, including Saint Theodore the Studite, stated that an image shares the form of its model through imitation, though its physical substance remains distinct. Honour shown to the image passes directly to the prototype. For this reason, an artist functioned similarly to a manuscript scribe, copying authentic portrait types without adding personal inventions. The physical panel acted as a transparent window or door. When believers stood before the panel, they believed they were standing face-to-face with the sacred figure. Originality in the modern sense was not a primary goal for the icon painter. Every sacred image was considered a direct copy of an original divine prototype rather than a secondary copy of another painting. As long as the portrait retained its recognizable features, it fulfilled its sacred function. Physical Veneration and Miracle Images Icons fulfilled direct practical roles in private and public devotion throughout the Byzantine world. Believers kissed panels, wore away painted faces through physical contact, and carried icons into military battles. Written accounts described miraculous icons that wept or emitted the scent of incense. Because the cult of icons grew so influential, authorities banned religious images from 726 to 843 during the Iconoclastic Controversy, citing biblical prohibitions against idolatry. Sanctity was also transferred through physical contact with holy sites and sacred objects. Pilgrims acquired eulogiai, which were small clay tokens, pewter ampullae, or wax discs stamped with holy figures. Tokens from the shrine of Saint Symeon Stylites contained earth from his mountain stamped with his portrait. Metal ampullae from Jerusalem displayed architectural features of the Holy Sepulchre alongside scenes of the Resurrection. These stamped images allowed worshippers to access divine protection through visual resemblance. Spatial Contexts and Geographic Expansion Icons were adapted to specific spatial settings and donor requests. Mural mosaics, such as the Annunciation at Daphni, placed figures on curved architectural surfaces like squinches. The Virgin Mary stood frontally while facing the Archangel Gabriel across the physical space of the church. Other panel icons included painted donor portraits. On a thirteenth-century Moses icon at Mount Sinai, a small donor figure crouches on the frame. Metal covers on other icons added donor portraits directly to the border. The iconic tradition expanded beyond Constantinople throughout the Balkans and Russia. Russian painters maintained established Byzantine models while introducing distinct colour palettes. Andrei Rublev painted the Old record Trinity around 1410 to 1420, depicting the three angels who visited Abraham at Mamre. Rublev used controlled combinations of turquoise alongside orange and vermilion tones. Despite regional variations in colour, the fundamental visual structure of the Byzantine icon remained consistent across the Orthodox world.