Curated by Artists
Museum Quality Prints
Crafted to Last
Designed for Interiors
Style It Your Way
Popular prints available framed or on canvas
Timeless Art For Beautifully Designed Homes
Why Choose Us ?
What customers say
Over 5000
Happy Art Lovers
From Our Journal
Dürer Painted Himself as Christ in 1500 and Signed It "AD"
Albrecht Dürer painted three self-portraits during his lifetime, and the third one (the 1500 panel now in the Alte Pinakothek in Munich) is the one that is impossible to ignore. He shows himself face-on, in absolute frontal symmetry, with long brown hair falling to his shoulders, and his right hand raised to touch the fur collar of his cloak. The composition deliberately mirrors the established iconography of Christ as Salvator Mundi, the Saviour of the World. The painting is signed and dated. In the upper right of the panel is the monogram AD, the merged-letter signature Dürer used on all his mature work. Next to it is the date 1500. On the left, in Latin: "I, Albrecht Dürer of Nuremberg, made my own likeness with imperishable colours, at the age of twenty-eight years." It was an extraordinary thing for a painter to do in 1500. Christ was not painted face-on in symmetrical composition by accident. The pose was a sacred convention. Dürer's use of it for his own portrait was a public claim about what a painter was, or could be. Nuremberg Dürer was born in 1471 in Nuremberg, a free imperial city in southern Germany. His father was a goldsmith from Hungary. Dürer was apprenticed first to his father, then to the painter Michael Wolgemut, and then travelled as a journeyman for four years through Switzerland, the Rhineland, and (in 1494 to 1495) to Venice. He returned to Nuremberg in 1495, married Agnes Frey, and opened his own workshop. He was the most technically gifted German painter of his generation, but his real revolution was in prints. The woodcut series The Apocalypse (1498) and the engraved Adam and Eve (1504) used printmaking technique at a level no German artist had reached. Prints made his reputation international within a decade. What the Self-Portrait Argued The 1500 self-portrait makes three arguments simultaneously, and each was new in northern European painting. The first argument is about the painter. By posing himself as Christ, Dürer is claiming that the painter is a maker on the order of God: capable of creating things ex nihilo, deserving of the same iconic dignity. This was a Renaissance Italian idea (Alberti and Leonardo had argued versions of it) that Dürer was importing into the northern tradition. No German painter had ever made such a claim about his own profession. The second argument is about the self-portrait as a form. The pose, the lighting, the inscription, and the date all combine to insist that this image is a permanent record of a specific man at a specific age. Dürer wants this image to outlast him. The Latin inscription, with its claim about "imperishable colours," is a deliberate gesture toward a Renaissance ideal of art that survives the artist. The third argument is religious. By 1500, Dürer was already interested in theological questions that would, a generation later, become Lutheran. The painting predates Luther's 95 Theses by seventeen years, but it shares a sensibility: a direct relationship between the individual and Christ, an emphasis on the believer being made in God's image. The painter who paints himself as Christ is not committing blasphemy; he is asserting his soul's likeness to its maker. Albrecht Dürer, Melencolia I, 1514. Engraving. National Gallery of Art, Washington. The other Dürer image that has carried the most interpretive weight: a winged figure surrounded by tools of geometry, alchemy, and architecture, brooding under a comet. The Technique The panel is small: about 67 by 49 centimetres. The support is lime wood, prepared with a chalk ground, painted in oil with multiple thin glazes. The hair is the most technically remarkable part: each individual strand is visible at close range, painted with a single-bristle brush in a single pass. The fur collar is built up in a similar method, hair by hair. Dürer had spent his journeyman years studying Netherlandish painting, and the technical level of the 1500 self-portrait reflects what he had learned. The Van Eyck brothers had developed the small-panel oil technique a century earlier, and Dürer's panel descends directly from that tradition. The thin glazes give the skin a luminous transparency. The hair and fur, painted in the upper layers, sit forward of the face. The eyes (which Dürer painted last) hold the viewer with an intensity that none of his other portraits achieve. The Reception The painting was not commissioned. Dürer painted it for himself, and it stayed in his possession until his death in 1528. After his death, the panel passed through several private collections in Nuremberg, then to the Bavarian Wittelsbach collection, and eventually to the Alte Pinakothek, where it has hung since the museum opened in 1836. The painting was attacked and venerated in roughly equal measure during the centuries between Dürer's death and its arrival at the Pinakothek. Counter-Reformation Catholic writers considered it blasphemous; Protestant Pietists considered it deeply spiritual; Romantic-era German nationalists treated it as a foundational image of German genius. By 1900 it was uncontroversial as a great painting; by 1960 it was being read as the founding gesture of the modern self-portrait tradition. The Other Self-Portraits Dürer painted his first self-portrait in silverpoint at thirteen, in 1484. It survives in the Albertina in Vienna. The face is angular, the eyes large and a little frightened, the hand pointing at something off the page. It is the work of a precocious child documenting himself. The second self-portrait, painted in 1493, shows him at twenty-two in a striped pink shawl, holding a thistle. It is in the Louvre. The pose is three-quarter, the expression slightly arch. The painting may have been a gift to his future wife Agnes Frey, intended as a betrothal portrait. The third, the 1500 panel, is the one that mattered. Dürer painted no more independent self-portraits after it. He included himself, in face and dress, in several later religious paintings (the Feast of the Rosary in Prague has a self-portrait figure in the right background), but he never again painted himself alone on a single panel. The 1500 portrait had said what could be said. He did not try to repeat it. What the Painting Did The 1500 self-portrait changed the conditions under which northern European painters thought about themselves. After Dürer, German painters routinely included self-portraits in religious commissions, often as background figures. The status of the painter shifted: no longer a craftsman in a guild structure, increasingly an intellectual claiming a place in the new humanist culture. The painting also did something simpler. It produced one of the most arresting human faces in European art. The mirror-like symmetry, the direct gaze, the inscribed claim about imperishable colour: these elements combine into an image that holds the viewer the way few painted faces do. Five hundred and twenty-six years later, the painting is still doing what Dürer asked it to do.
Hammershøi Painted the Same Two Rooms for Twenty Years
In May 1898, Vilhelm Hammershøi and his wife Ida moved into a first-floor apartment at Strandgade 30 in the Christianshavn district of Copenhagen. The building was a seventeenth-century merchant's house with high-ceilinged rooms, white panelled walls, and small north-facing windows. They lived there for the next eleven years. During that time Hammershøi painted, by recent count, approximately sixty interiors of the apartment. The paintings are nearly all the same: a doorway, a small section of wall, a piece of dark furniture, sometimes the back of a single figure. The figure, when present, is usually Ida. She faces away from the viewer, often in the act of leaving the room. The light is northern and grey. The walls are white-grey. The floors are dark wood. Nothing in the paintings indicates the year, the season, or any specific occasion. Copenhagen Hammershøi was born in Copenhagen in 1864, into a merchant family. He studied at the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts in the early 1880s under teachers who taught a conservative version of late nineteenth-century academic painting. He was a competent student, won prizes, and exhibited at the Charlottenborg from 1885 onwards. By the early 1890s he had begun the kind of interiors and figure paintings that would define the rest of his career. He married Ida Ilsted in 1891. Ida was the sister of his fellow painter Peter Ilsted, and the two painters maintained a close working friendship for the rest of Hammershøi's life. Ida had been a model in his student work and continued to model for many of his mature paintings, almost always with her back turned. What the Rooms Look Like The Strandgade 30 apartment had a recurring set of architectural features that Hammershøi painted over and over. A doorway opening through to a back room. A small white stove. A bookcase. A windowless wall section with a single hanging picture. A polished wooden floor that caught the grey light. The whole palette of the building was within twenty values: bone white, grey-white, dove grey, soft black, mahogany brown. Hammershøi painted these elements in different combinations across sixty canvases. Sometimes a doorway with no figure. Sometimes a doorway with Ida walking through. Sometimes a section of wall and an empty chair. Sometimes a piano with no player. The compositions are not arbitrary: each painting is built on a strict geometric grid, with the doorways aligned to specific vertical axes and the figures placed at calculated points in the visual field. Vilhelm Hammershøi, Sunshine in the Drawing Room, 1903. Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen. One of the rare paintings with strong sunlight rather than overcast grey. What He Was Doing The standard reading is that Hammershøi was painting silence. The reading is correct in its way. His pictures are quiet, and the quietness is structural: the rooms are empty enough to function as compositional fields rather than as containers for action. The light is even and unmoving. The figures, when they appear, are passing through. The more useful reading is that Hammershøi was painting the same problem repeatedly. The problem was how to balance a Vermeer-influenced understanding of light against the late nineteenth-century Whistlerian interest in tonal harmony, both inside the constraint of a single architectural setting. By restricting his subject to one apartment, Hammershøi turned the painting practice into a kind of laboratory. The variables (figure or no figure, doorway open or closed, light direction, season) could be tested against an unchanging set. Vermeer had used a similar method 250 years earlier. Hammershøi's small interiors descend directly from Vermeer's small interiors. The connection is not historical accident: Hammershøi saw Vermeer paintings at the Mauritshuis on visits to the Netherlands in 1887 and 1897, and several of his interiors quote Vermeer compositions directly. Both painters used a single room as a study laboratory. Both painters limited their palettes. Both painters used a recurring figure (Vermeer's domestic women, Hammershøi's Ida) to anchor compositions without dramatising them. The Reception Hammershøi was successful in his lifetime. He exhibited regularly at the Charlottenborg, won the gold medal at the 1900 Paris Universal Exposition, and was bought by Danish and German collectors at increasing prices. His reputation was secure across northern Europe by 1905. His reputation outside Scandinavia, however, did not survive his death. The early twentieth century moved past the kind of mood painting he produced, and his interiors looked, by the 1920s, like a kind of nineteenth-century relic. He was largely ignored by the international art-historical establishment for almost seventy years after his death in 1916. The recovery began in the 1980s, accelerated through the 1990s, and reached a popular peak in the 2010s when a major Royal Academy retrospective in London and a Met retrospective in New York brought him to wide international notice. The pictures had not changed. The audience had become ready to see them again. Why It Took So Long Hammershøi's pictures resist most of the things the twentieth-century art-historical mainstream wanted from painting. They are not formally innovative in the modernist sense. They are not narratively rich. They are not politically engaged. They do not use new pigments, new techniques, or new subjects. They paint the same room with the same person across two decades. The qualities the pictures do have (attention, patience, restraint, a refusal of drama) are difficult to argue for in a critical environment trained to look for break and innovation. The recovery of Hammershøi in the late twentieth century coincided with a wider cultural willingness to value attention as a virtue. The pictures became readable again because audiences had learned, after sixty years of art that demanded attention from them, to value art that gave attention back. What He Left Hammershøi died in February 1916, aged fifty-one, from throat cancer. He had moved out of Strandgade 30 in 1909 and into a slightly larger apartment, but had continued to paint variations of the same kinds of interiors there. Ida outlived him by thirty-three years and died in 1949, having looked after his estate and continued to model occasionally for his brother-in-law Peter Ilsted. The approximately sixty Strandgade 30 interiors are now distributed across the Statens Museum for Kunst in Copenhagen, the Ordrupgaard collection outside Copenhagen, the Hirschsprung Collection, and a network of museums in Germany, France, Britain, and the United States. The Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen has the largest single concentration. The apartment itself was demolished in the 1980s. The building still stands, but the interior layout was replaced. The rooms now exist only in the paintings. They were never large or elaborate. They were not interesting in their original form. They became interesting because a man with a small palette, a methodical compositional habit, and twenty years of patience kept painting them.
Frida Kahlo Painted 143 Pictures and 55 Were Self-Portraits
Frida Kahlo produced about 143 paintings in a working life of twenty-eight years. Fifty-five of them were self-portraits. The proportion is unusual for a painter who could draw anything. Kahlo painted herself repeatedly because she had a working model permanently available (herself), because she was almost continuously injured and could not always travel to other sitters, and because the figure she most wanted to investigate was the one she could not stop being. The story of Kahlo has been compressed in popular culture into a few large events: the streetcar accident at eighteen, the marriage to Diego Rivera, the affairs, the surgeries, the unibrow. The compression is accurate to the headlines and misleading about the work. What Kahlo actually did, day by day for twenty-eight years, was sit in front of a small mirror and paint herself. The Accident On 17 September 1925, Kahlo was eighteen and a student at the Escuela Nacional Preparatoria in Mexico City. She was travelling home on a wooden bus that collided with an electric streetcar at the corner of Cuauhtemoctzin and Calzada de Tlalpan. The streetcar drove the bus forward; the bus collapsed; an iron handrail entered her body through her left hip and exited through her vagina. Her spine was fractured in three places. Her right leg was broken in eleven places. Her right foot was crushed. Her collarbone was broken. Two of her ribs were broken. Her pelvis was broken in three places. She survived. The medical care she received in 1925 Mexico City was unable to fully repair any of these injuries. She underwent more than thirty surgeries across her remaining twenty-eight years, was repeatedly placed in plaster body casts and metal corsets, and lived with continuous physical pain. The accident is the single fact from which the rest of her biography unfolds. The Studio That Was a Bed She began painting during the long convalescence. Her mother had a special easel made that allowed her to work lying down. A mirror was set into the canopy of the bed so that she could see her own face while immobile. The first self-portrait was made in 1926, in the year following the accident. Kahlo painted in oil. Her early canvases are small, often less than fifty centimetres on a side. The smallness was practical: she was working from a bed and could not handle large supports. The smallness also fits the kind of attention she was paying. A small painting forces the viewer close enough to read every detail. Kahlo's self-portraits ask to be read at the distance she painted them, which was the distance from her own face to her own mirror. Frida Kahlo, The Broken Column, 1944. Museo Dolores Olmedo, Mexico City. Painted after a spinal surgery that fused several of her vertebrae. The Marriage Kahlo met Diego Rivera in 1928. He was twenty-one years older, already a famous muralist, and married twice before. They were married in August 1929. Rivera weighed roughly twice what Kahlo did; Kahlo's mother described the wedding photographs as "the marriage of an elephant and a dove." The marriage produced two extended separations and one divorce-and-remarriage. Rivera had affairs with Kahlo's sister Cristina in 1934 and with multiple other women across the marriage. Kahlo had affairs in response, including with the photographer Nickolas Muray and (briefly) with Leon Trotsky in 1937 when the Trotskys were sheltering at the Casa Azul in Coyoacán. The marriage worked in spite of all this. Rivera was the most respected painter in Mexico during the period; Kahlo's reputation was secondary to his, both publicly and (somewhat) in her own self-presentation. They lived next door to each other in twin houses connected by a bridge after their 1940 remarriage. He died in 1957, three years after she did. The Subject She Made Her Own Kahlo's self-portraits are not a sequence of likenesses. They are a sequence of arguments. Each painting takes the same face (heavy brow, full mouth, severe parted hair, often with elaborate hairstyles or floral arrangements) and uses it as the centre of a composition that argues for something specific: a political position, a medical fact, a marital crisis, a relationship to her ancestry. The 1939 painting The Two Fridas shows her in two costumes (one Tehuana, one European), seated side by side, holding hands, with their exposed hearts joined by a single artery. The painting was made during the months Rivera was suing for divorce. The double-figure is Kahlo arguing publicly that she contained both identities (Mexican peasant heritage on her mother's side, European bourgeois on her father's) and that the loss of Rivera would not collapse either. The 1944 painting The Broken Column shows her in a metal medical corset, her body split open vertically to reveal a crumbling Ionic column where her spine should be. The painting was made after a spinal surgery that had fused several of her vertebrae. The argument is direct: this is what is wrong with me. What the Self-Portraits Are For The conventional reading of Kahlo's self-portraits is that they are confessional, that they document her life directly, and that her work is therefore a form of autobiography. This reading is not wrong, but it is incomplete. The self-portraits are also, more importantly, a discipline. They are a daily exercise in looking at the same subject and finding something new in it. The same face, painted fifty-five times, becomes a kind of laboratory. Kahlo varies the costume, the background, the colour palette, the symbolism. The face itself is the constant. The variables are everything else. The painter who emerges from this discipline is more rigorous than the confessional reading suggests. Kahlo was not unloading her trauma onto canvas. She was building, painting by painting, a way of using the self-portrait as a structural form. The form was Mexican Catholic devotional painting (the small ex-voto pictures hung in churches across Mexico), the materials were European oil-on-canvas, and the subject was a woman who had been almost destroyed at eighteen and was working out, methodically, what could be salvaged. The End Kahlo's right leg was amputated at the knee in August 1953. Gangrene had developed from the original 1925 injuries. She lived less than a year afterwards. The last self-portrait, painted in 1953 or 1954, shows her in a brace and corset, on the front porch of the Casa Azul, with a small dog at her feet. She died on 13 July 1954, aged forty-seven. The official cause of death was pulmonary embolism. Her diary, found after her death, ended with the line, "I hope the leaving is joyful and I hope never to return." The 143 paintings, including the 55 self-portraits, were spread across several Mexican museums, private collections, and (a small number) international institutions. The Casa Azul became a museum dedicated to her in 1958. The reputation that had been secondary to Rivera's during her lifetime became, by the 1980s, larger than his. She is now the most famous Mexican artist of the twentieth century and one of the most reproduced female painters in any tradition. What survives is not the biography. The biography has been retold often enough to dull. What survives is the discipline. Fifty-five times, in front of the same mirror, painting the same face with absolute attention.