The Atlas Collection
Travel posters
For places worth remembering. Modern prints inspired by favourite coastlines, towns and landmarks.
New destinations added regularly
Posters from the places you love
Over 2,700 curated artists
Browse all artists
Curated by Artists
Museum Quality Prints
Crafted to Last
Designed for Interiors
Style It Your Way
Popular prints available framed or on canvas
Timeless Art For Beautifully Designed Homes
Why Choose Us ?
What customers say
Over 5000
Happy Art Lovers
From Our Journal
Renoir's Boating Party: Who Was at the Table?
Pierre-Auguste Renoir painted Luncheon of the Boating Party in 1881 on the balcony of the Restaurant Fournaise in Chatou. The composition brings together fourteen named friends, acquaintances, and models from contemporary Parisian society around a lunch table along the River Seine. Identifications at the Restaurant Fournaise In the left foreground of the 1881 canvas, Renoir’s fiancée and future wife, Aline Charigot, sits at the table playing with a small dog. She wears a Prussian blue dress paired with a hat decorated with orange-red flowers. Directly across the table in the right foreground sits the painter Gustave Caillebotte. A keen rower, Caillebotte is depicted wearing a straw hat and a white sleeveless shirt while straddling a chair. Seated beside him, model Angèle Legault drinks from a glass while wearing a blue-and-white hat. Antonio Maggiolo, an Italian journalist, leans over the table to speak with her. The remaining figures surrounding the table represent a cross-section of Parisian social circles. Leaning back against the balustrade is Alphonse Fournaise, the son of the restaurant proprietor. His sister, Louise-Alphonsine Fournaise, rests her chin on her hand as she leans against the wooden railing. Further back, actress Jeanne Samary covers her ears with her fingers. Standing beside her are painter Paul Lhôte, dressed in red and white clothing, and Eugène-Pierre Lestringuez, a civil servant from the Ministry of the Interior. Art historian and banker Charles Ephrussi stands in a black top hat, conversing with poet Jules Laforgue, who is smoking a pipe. Actress Ellen Andrée wears pearl earrings while conversing with Maggiolo. Social Hierarchy and Placement The gathering on the terrace at Chatou presents a casual assembly of contemporaries from various social strata. Academic painting conventions of the nineteenth century typically rendered individuals of higher social standing at a larger physical scale to denote rank. Renoir discarded this traditional hierarchy, relying entirely on visual perspective to establish the relative size of each figure. Wealthy art patrons, working actresses, rowers, and civil servants occupy the same scene without spatial artificiality. Charles Ephrussi, an affluent banker and art historian, stands near the back of the group in formal attire, sharing space with informal rowers and studio models. Behind the assembled party, the River Seine remains visible through the balcony structure, complete with passing sailing boats on the water. The setting at the Restaurant Fournaise allowed Renoir to depict his acquaintances relaxing together in an informal outdoor environment. Pierre-Auguste Renoir - Luncheon on the Boating Party (Detail - Still life). Public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. Composition and Use of Light The structural composition relies on the diagonal line of the wooden balcony railing to divide the canvas into two distinct regions. One half of the space contains a dense, overlapping group of figures engaged in conversation. The opposite side remains largely open, featuring only Louise-Alphonsine Fournaise and her brother Alphonse. This division places structural emphasis on the proprietor's children through the contrast between the crowded and vacant areas of the terrace. Illumination enters the balcony through a large opening adjacent to the standing man in the hat and the woman leaning on the railing. Renoir unified the composition by allowing light to reflect off specific surface areas, including the white tablecloth and the sleeveless tops worn by the men in the foreground. He selected complementary colours, placing the orange-red of the flowers on Aline Charigot’s hat against the Prussian blue of her dress, while repeating these tones in muted shades across the clothing of background figures. Revisions and Studio Practice Renoir commenced the work without preparing formal preliminary sketches, relying only on minimal underdrawing directly on the canvas surface. Modern technical examinations using X-radiographic and infrared analysis demonstrate that the artist altered the arrangement repeatedly during execution. The scans reveal that a figure initially positioned to look directly towards the viewer was later painted over and replaced by a male figure facing Alphonsine. The process of completing the canvas proved logistically complex because the models posed in small groups or as individuals rather than all at once. Models frequently arrived late or failed to keep their appointments, disrupting the artist's schedule. In a letter to his patron Paul Berard, Renoir expressed his frustration with the painting, stating that he no longer knew where he was with the work and that it was annoying him increasingly. Reception and Exhibition History The completed canvas was displayed at the Seventh Impressionist Exhibition in 1882, held in rented rooms at 251 Rue Saint-Honoré in Paris. The business operations of the exhibition were managed by the art dealer Paul Durand-Ruel, allowing the participating artists to focus on their entries. Three contemporary critics declared Renoir's canvas to be the finest painting in the exhibition. Writing in Le Pays on 10 March 1882, critic Paul de Charry described the work as fresh and free without being bawdy. In La Vie Moderne on 11 March 1882, Armand Silvestre praised the draftsmanship, noting that the remarkable drawing resulted from the juxtaposition of hues rather than outlined edges, calling it one of the most beautiful pieces produced by independent artists. In contrast, Albert Wolff published a harsh review in Le Figaro on 2 March 1882, writing that Renoir would have produced a pretty picture had he learned to draw. The painting was eventually acquired for the Phillips Collection in the United States, where actor Edward G. Robinson later described spending hours standing before the canvas during visits to the museum in Washington.
Gilgamesh and the Cost of Kingship
Gilgamesh returned to Uruk after defeating every man who could withstand his arms and ruled through strength and arrogance. The people condemned his taking of their sons and brides, then appealed to the gods, who called on Aruru to create a remedy. Gilgamesh's Tyranny in Uruk Gilgamesh went abroad and defeated every man who could withstand his arms before he returned to Uruk. He stormed through the city by day and by night, proud of his strength and royal power. The men of Uruk said that he sounded the alarm for his own amusement and that his arrogance had no bounds. No son remained with his father because Gilgamesh took them all. They said that a king was a shepherd to his people. The people also condemned Gilgamesh’s treatment of women. They said that his lust left no virgin with her lover. He claimed the bride-right and sought sex with another man’s bride on her wedding night. The complaints named a warrior’s daughter and a noble’s wife. The women prayed to their goddesses and repeated their sorrows month after month. The men of Uruk appealed to the gods for relief. The gods of heaven heard their complaints and went to Anu, the god of Uruk. They said that Gilgamesh had been made strong as a savage bull, that no one could withstand his arms, and that he took the sons and brides of the city. Anu heard their lamentation, and the gods called on Aruru, the goddess of creation. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Gilgamesh. A New Translation of the Ancient Epic (2021) [Retail]; THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH : an English version with an introduction. Gilgamesh Returns to Uruk Gilgamesh returned through the gate by which he had first gone out, with Urshanabi travelling beside him. They journeyed for twenty leagues, then stopped to eat. After another thirty leagues, they halted for the night. Gilgamesh saw a well of cool water, went down to it, and bathed. A serpent lay deep in the pool. It sensed the sweetness of the flower Gilgamesh carried, rose from the water, and seized it. The serpent sloughed its skin and slipped back into the well. Gilgamesh sat down and wept. He took Urshanabi by the hand and asked whether all his toil and suffering had brought him anything. The creature of the earth now possessed the prize. The stream had already carried the flower twenty leagues towards the channels where he had found it. He had found a sign and then lost it. Gilgamesh continued with Urshanabi and reached Uruk again. He then directed Urshanabi to climb the city wall, walk its length, survey its foundation, and study its brickwork. The wall was made from oven-baked bricks. It marked what Gilgamesh had achieved for the city. The journey ended with Gilgamesh directing attention to Uruk and its enduring wall as the lasting work of his life. Gilgamesh Returns to Uruk. Original MythSource illustration created for this story; not a historical artwork. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH : an English version with an introduction; Gilgamesh. A New Translation of the Ancient Epic (2021) [Retail]. The Gods Condemn Enkidu After killing the Bull of Heaven, Gilgamesh and Enkidu returned to Uruk. They cut out the Bull’s heart and gave it to Shamash. In the palace, they washed their hands in the Euphrates, embraced, and went away. The heroes gathered in the streets, and Gilgamesh called to the singing girls. He asked who was the most glorious of heroes and the most eminent among men. They answered that Gilgamesh was both. Feasting and celebration continued in the palace, and the two heroes later lay down to sleep. During the night, Enkidu dreamed that Anu, Enlil, Ea, and Shamash sat in council. Anu said that Gilgamesh and Enkidu had killed the Bull of Heaven and Humbaba, guardian of the cedar forest. Because of these killings, one of the two had to die. Enlil declared that Enkidu would die, while Gilgamesh would live. Shamash objected. He asked whether the two had not killed the Bull and Humbaba at his command, and questioned why Enkidu should die. Enlil grew angry and asked why the Sun God had marched with them as a comrade in arms. The gods nevertheless chose Enkidu as the victim. Enkidu rose and told Gilgamesh the dream, calling him his brother. He understood that death would separate them. Lying before Gilgamesh, he shed streams of tears and lamented that no one would bring him back from the dead. He would sit with the shades, cross the threshold of death, and never again see his companion. The judgement followed the deeds that had brought the two heroes together. Enkidu had refused Humbaba’s plea for mercy, broken the taboo of the gate, and insulted Ishtar. Gilgamesh had shared in the killings, but the punishment fell first on Enkidu. Source note: Primary text: the ancient sources. Corpus check: Gilgamesh. A New Translation of the Ancient Epic (2021) [Retail]; THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH : an English version with an introduction.
Degas Backstage: The Work Behind the Ballet
Edgar Degas transformed ballet depictions by moving past the stage performance into rehearsal halls and dressing rooms. Through rigorous sketching and close observation, he recorded the relentless training and social dynamics behind the Paris Opéra. Shift to the Practice Room Edgar Degas was born in Paris to an affluent family and initially studied law before committing to art. He trained under Louis Lamothe, a former pupil of Ingres, and spent time copying masterworks in the Louvre alongside travels to Rome, Naples, and Florence. During the late 1860s, after producing early historical paintings and portraits, Degas shifted his focus to contemporary urban subjects, including racecourses, women at work, and the theatre. After serving in the artillery during the Franco-Prussian War and making a trip to New Orleans in 1872, Degas returned to Paris and helped organize the first Impressionist exhibition in 1874. From the early 1870s onward, his interest turned decisively toward the ballet. Rather than limiting himself to public performances, he sought entry into the rehearsal halls and practice rooms where dancers took their daily lessons. Small early compositions like The Rehearsal Room (c. 1871) and The Dance Lesson (1872) record these working spaces with careful precision. In the Paris painting, ballet master Louis Mérante stands holding a staff while guiding a student, surrounded by dancers in rehearsal dress. Arched mirrors positioned along the walls reflect opposite sides of the room, suggesting a broader environment of disciplined repetition. Practicality, Observation, and Craft Capturing the mechanical effort of ballet demanded extensive observation and scores of preparatory sketches. In Le Foyer de la danse à l'Opéra de la rue Le Peletier (1872), Degas arranged a balanced group of figures across the canvas, assigning each dancer an individual movement or pause. He chose to document physical fatigue, stretching, and routine instruction rather than polished theatrical elegance. Degas drew upon varied artistic precedents to structure his rehearsal scenes. While his precise draftsmanship and small scale recalled the eighteenth-century genre scenes of Watteau and Pater, his framing reflected a keen interest in photography and Japanese prints. He used unexpected cropped angles, off-centre compositions, and natural light entering from hidden side windows to convey an unposed quality. Unlike many Impressionist colleagues who favoured small, variegated strokes outdoors, Degas maintained structured contours and applied bold, slashing brushwork inside the studio. He experimented with photography to capture sudden shifts in posture, treating the canvas like a frozen snapshot. This careful preparation allowed him to render complex physical movement while preserving an air of absolute spontaneity. Degas dance class. Public domain; source: Wikimedia Commons. The Viewpoint of the Opera Insider Degas gained behind-the-scenes access to the Paris Opéra through personal connections with figures like the composer Désiré Dihau and the librettist Ludovic Halévy. In compositions such as Dancers Backstage (c. 1875) and The Curtain (c. 1880), the viewer experiences the scene from the perspective of an insider standing in the wings or beside stage flats. In The Curtain, pastel applied over a monotype base depicts dancers in rose stockings alongside performers dressed en travesti in yellow-orange pants. Positioned among them are the rigid, black-clad legs of male subscribers, known as abonnés. Members of exclusive groups like the Jockey Club held significant influence at the Opéra, possessing private admission rights to the green room and acting as financial patrons. Degas examined these social encounters directly in Dancer in Her Dressing Room (c. 1880). The artwork shows a young performer preparing for the stage while an older duenna, often the dancer's mother, adjusts the waist of her tutu. Deep in the shadows at the edge of the room sits a male protector, illustrating the patron system that operated behind the public spectacle. Visual Contrast and Distance Throughout his ballet series, Degas built strong visual contrasts between dark geometric forms and brightly coloured performers. In Musicians of the Orchestra (1872), the dark heads of the foreground musicians loom large against the illuminated pink and white tutus on stage. A similar device appears in Ballet Dancer (c. 1878), where the dark silhouette of a double bass cuts across the light fabric of a performer's dress. In works like Café-Concert (c. 1878) and Dancers at the Old Opera House (c. 1877), Degas positioned the viewer within orchestra pits or stage boxes. In Dancers at the Old Opera House, the dancers recede into the space with overlapping tutus and tangled legs, seen directly from an executive box. The dark shadow of the box foregrounds the bright stage, emphasizing physical distance. While contemporary writers often expressed patronizing attitudes toward ballet dancers, Degas maintained an objective distance. He avoided sentimental treatment, choosing instead to record both the ambition of the dancers and the vanity of the abonnés with cool detachment. In his monotypes and pastels, he frequently caricatured both parties, accentuating clumsy gestures and social pretensions with equal neutrality. Late Works and Technical Shift By the mid-1880s, when Degas reached the age of fifty, his failing eyesight led to a shift in his artistic media. He relied less on oil painting and dedicated more time to pastels, monotypes, and wax sculpture. These materials allowed him to work directly with tactile forms and broad, expressive strokes of colour. His late depictions of dancers grew increasingly abstract and focused on primary forms. In Dancers on the Stage (c. 1885), figures are cropped radically by the frame, with a forearm extending into the lower corner to imply a viewer standing just inside the wings. The specific social context of the abonné faded, replaced by an intense concentration on body contours, light, and surface texture. Rather than viewing the dance as narrative theatre, the older Degas treated the human body as a vehicle for studying posture and physical effort. Dancers resting on stage, such as those in Ballet Dancers (c. 1878), provided structural shapes that he reconfigured across dozens of late pastels. His backstage series ultimately documented the physical labor of dance through rigorous drawing and technical experimentation.